Commit 9ed66dae by Parameswaran Ajith

added problems from structure formation.

parent 1b554fe7
Showing with 67 additions and 0 deletions
No preview for this file type
...@@ -67,3 +67,70 @@ Explain the physical origin of the differences. ...@@ -67,3 +67,70 @@ Explain the physical origin of the differences.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
\subsection{Linear Structure Formation}
We work in the Newtonian regime on sub-horizon scales.
Unless stated otherwise, assume a homogeneous background described by scale factor
$a(t)$ and Hubble parameter $H = \dot a/a$. In comoving coordinates, the Newtonian fluid equations are:
\begin{eqnarray}
{\dot \delta} + \frac{1}{a}\nabla \cdot \bm{v} = 0 ~~ \mathrm{(Continuity)} \\
{ \bm{\dot v}} + H\bm{v} = -\frac{1}{a}\nabla \phi - \frac{1}{a\bar\rho}\nabla p ~~ ~~ \mathrm{(Euler)} \\
\nabla^2 \phi = 4\pi G a^2 \bar\rho\, \delta ~~\mathrm{(Poisson)}.
\end{eqnarray}
Here, $ \delta \equiv ({\rho - \bar\rho})/{\bar\rho}$ is the density contrast and $\bm{v}$ is the peculiar velocity.
\subsubsection{Problems}
\begin{enumerate}
\item Assume $|\delta| \ll 1$ and linearize the equations. Take the divergence of the Euler equation and use the continuity
equation to eliminate $\nabla\cdot\bm{v}$. Using the Poisson equation to eliminate $\phi$, show that
\begin{eqnarray}
\ddot\delta + 2H\dot\delta
- 4\pi G \bar\rho\, \delta - \frac{c_s^2}{a^2}\nabla^2 \delta = 0,
\end{eqnarray}
where $c_s^2 = \partial p/\partial\rho$. What physical timescales appear in this equation? When does instability occur?
\item Assume pressureless dark matter ($c_s = 0$). In a matter-dominated universe:
$a(t) \propto t^{2/3}, ~~ H = \frac{2}{3t}, ~~ \bar\rho = \frac{1}{6\pi G t^2}.$ Substitute these expressions into the growth equation and show that
\begin{equation}
\ddot\delta + \frac{4}{3t}\dot\delta
- \frac{2}{3t^2}\delta = 0.
\end{equation}
\item Assume a power-law solution $\delta \propto t^n$ and solve for $n$.
Show that the growing mode scales as
\begin{equation}
\delta \propto t^{2/3} \propto a(t).
\end{equation}
\item Why is the growth only linear in $a(t)$ rather than exponential?
Discuss the role of the Hubble drag term.
\item Now include pressure. Fourier-decompose the perturbation: $\delta(\bm{x},t) = \delta_k(t)e^{i\bm{k}\cdot\bm{x}}.$ Show that each mode satisfies
\begin{equation}
\ddot\delta_k + 2H\dot\delta_k
+ \left(\frac{c_s^2 k^2}{a^2}
- 4\pi G \bar\rho\right)\delta_k = 0.
\end{equation}
\item Discuss the behavior in the limits: 1) $k \rightarrow 0$ (large scales), 2) large $k$ (small scales). Explain physically when perturbations grow and when they oscillate.
\item Consider a static background ($H=0$). Define the Jeans wavenumber $k_J$ and show that $k_J^2 = \frac{4\pi G\bar\rho}{c_s^2}$.
\item Define the Jeans length $\lambda_J = 2\pi/k_J$.
Show that the Jeans mass scales as $M_J \sim \frac{c_s^3}{G^{3/2}\bar\rho^{1/2}}.$
\item In an expanding universe, is the Jeans scale constant?
Discuss qualitatively how expansion modifies gravitational instability.
\item Show that instability occurs when the free-fall time $t_{\rm dyn} \sim (G\bar\rho)^{-1/2} $ is shorter than 1) the sound-crossing time and 2) the expansion time $H^{-1}$. Discuss how structure formation can be understood entirely
as a competition between timescales (in the spirit of our first lecture).
\end{enumerate}
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or sign in to comment